US Bridges

RTE 59 over South Pascack RD

PoorPosted for load

Rockland County, New York · 0.7 MI E JCT Rts 59+45 · Structure no. 000000001027670

Built
1931
94 years old, rebuilt 1974
Condition
Poor
inspected October 2024
Type
Box Beam or Girders - Multiple
Prestressed Concrete
Length
39 ft
1 main span
Daily traffic
19,772
2007 count
Owner
State
State Highway Agency

About this bridge

RTE 59 over South Pascack RD is a prestressed concrete box beam or girders - multiple carrying RTE 59 over South Pascack RD in Rockland County, New York. It was built in 1931 and reconstructed in 1974, so it is 94 years old, older than the New York average of 53 years.

The most recent inspection reported to the Federal Highway Administration rates it in poor condition with a lowest component rating of 4 out of 9. The lowest-rated primary component is rated 4 or below, indicating advanced deterioration. Poor does not mean unsafe; such bridges are inspected more often and may carry load restrictions. Its operating status is: posted for load restriction.

It carries about 19,772 vehicles a day, roughly 8% of them trucks, projected to reach 19,864 by 2041. The structure is 39 ft (11.9 m) long and 56 ft wide. If it were closed, the detour would be 2.5 mi (4 km).

CarriesRTE 59
CrossesSouth Pascack RD
Location0.7 MI E JCT Rts 59+45
RouteState Highway 59
Coordinates41.10494, -74.03258
Functional classUrban Other Principal Arterial

Condition and inspection

Poor

The lowest-rated primary component is rated 4 or below, indicating advanced deterioration. Poor does not mean unsafe; such bridges are inspected more often and may carry load restrictions.

ComponentRatingMeaning
Deck6 SatisfactoryStructural elements show some minor deterioration.
Superstructure4 PoorAdvanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
Substructure5 FairAll primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
Last inspectionOctober 2024
Inspection intervalevery 12 months
Operating statusPosted for load restriction
ScourBridge not over waterway
Structural evaluation3: Basically intolerable, requiring high priority of corrective action
Deck geometry5: Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is
Approach roadway alignment4: Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is
Operating rating32 US tons
Inventory rating12 US tons

Structure

MaterialPrestressed Concrete
DeckConcrete, cast-in-place
Main spans1
Design loadHS 15
Structure length39 ft (11.9 m)
Longest span38 ft (11.5 m)
Deck width56 ft (17.1 m)
Roadway width38 ft (11.6 m)
Vertical clearance over deckUnrestricted

Traffic and service

Average daily traffic19,772 (2007)
Projected traffic19,864 by 2041
Trucks8%
Lanes on structure2
Traffic directionTwo-way traffic
CarriesHighway and pedestrian
CrossesHighway
Detour if closed2.5 mi (4 km)
TollOn a free road
National Highway SystemYes

Ownership and planned work

OwnerState Highway Agency
Maintained byState Highway Agency
Historic statusNot eligible for the National Register of Historic Places
Work proposedDeck replacement with only incidental widening
Estimated improvement cost$2.2 million (2024 estimate)
NavigationNot applicable (no waterway)

Frequently asked questions

When was RTE 59 over South Pascack RD built?

It was built in 1931, making it 94 years old in 2025. It was reconstructed in 1974.

What condition is RTE 59 over South Pascack RD in?

The National Bridge Inventory rates it in poor condition. The lowest-rated primary component is rated 4 or below, indicating advanced deterioration. Poor does not mean unsafe; such bridges are inspected more often and may carry load restrictions. The last reported inspection was in October 2024.

How much traffic does RTE 59 over South Pascack RD carry?

About 19,772 vehicles per day (2007 count), of which roughly 8% are trucks.

How long is RTE 59 over South Pascack RD?

The structure is 39 ft (11.9 m) long with a longest span of 38 ft (11.5 m) and a deck 56 ft wide.

Who owns RTE 59 over South Pascack RD?

It is owned by the State Highway Agency.